AI Agent Development
Defining Agentic AI: Autonomy, Contextual Awareness & Tool Use
ThirdEye Data provides AI agent development services for enterprises looking to improve data-driven decision-making and automate complex workflows. We design and build AI agents that operate within real business processes and enterprise systems. Our focus is on reliability, governance, and long-term adoption. We help organizations move from experimentation to production with confidence.
Business Challenges or Problems We Address with AI Agent Development
At ThirdEye Data, we do not treat AI agents as experimental tools or generic copilots. We build AI agents to solve specific, recurring business problems where decisions and workflows break down at scale. Our focus is on areas where automation alone is not enough and human-driven processes need to scale.
Here are the business problems or challenges we have addressed with our custom AI agents:
Enterprises often rely on decisions that require data from multiple systems. This data is scattered, delayed, or manually consolidated. As a result, decisions are slow, inconsistent, and heavily dependent on individuals.
We build AI agents that continuously observe enterprise data, apply business logic, and present recommendations within existing workflows. These agents support decision-makers with timely, contextual insights while keeping humans in control.
Many enterprise workflows depend on people to trigger next steps, chase approvals, and handle exceptions. The conventional automation fails when processes involve judgment, context, or frequent variation.
Our AI agents orchestrate workflows end to end. They track process state, trigger actions across systems, and escalate only when required. This reduces operational delays without removing accountability.
Rule-based systems become difficult to maintain as processes grow complex. Every exception adds more logic, increasing cost and risk.
We design AI agents that combine deterministic rules with AI reasoning. Rules handle known paths. AI handles ambiguity. Humans remain part of the loop for high-impact decisions. We think this balance is critical in enterprise environments.
Teams waste productive time reviewing documents, validating records, reconciling data, and preparing summaries. This work is repetitive but sensitive.
We build task-focused AI agents that handle bounded knowledge work with accuracy and auditability. These agents reduce workload while maintaining trust and compliance in the operational process.
As volumes grow, organizations often choose between hiring more people or accepting lower quality. Both options are expensive.
We build goal-based AI agents to allow enterprises to scale decision support and workflow execution without linear cost growth. This enables growth while maintaining consistency and control.
ThirdEye Data’s Perspective on AI Agent Development
We do not recommend fully autonomous AI agents operating without oversight. We believe in adding a controlled intelligence layer to optimize the process to save time and money.
At ThirdEye Data, we focus on and deliver solutions where:
AI agents support decisions; they do not replace ownership
Automation improves workflows; it does not remove accountability
Trust, governance, and reliability matter more than novelty
Our hands-on experience across commercial or third-party tech stacks like Azure, AWS, Google, and Snowflake, and open-source ecosystems allows us to design AI agents that fit into real enterprise environments, not lab conditions.
Enterprises Trust Us for Building Controlled and Autonomous AI Agents
Core Business Functions Where ThirdEye Data Adds Value with AI Agents
At ThirdEye Data, we build AI agents for specific business functions where decisions, workflows, and data flows intersect. Our focus is not on building generic AI assistants. We design AI agents that operate inside enterprise processes and support measurable business outcomes.
Here are the functions where AI agents consistently deliver measurable value in our client engagements:
Operations and Process Execution
- Monitoring ongoing business processes and flagging exceptions
- Triggering next steps in approval or fulfillment workflows
- Coordinating tasks across teams and systems
- Escalating delays or SLA breaches automatically
Customer Experience and Support Operations
- Handling Tier-1 and Tier-2 customer queries
- Answering order, billing, and service status questions
- Creating and updating support tickets automatically
- Assisting customers through self-service portals
Sales, Marketing, and Revenue Operations
- Identifying and qualifying sales leads
- Automating follow-ups and reminders
- Supporting campaign execution and performance tracking
- Assisting with billing, renewals, loyalty rewards, and customer queries
Finance and Billing Operations
- Responding to invoice and payment status queries
- Generating and validating invoices
- Sending payment reminders
- Reviewing financial documents and flagging anomalies
Human Resources and Employee Operations
- Screening resumes and shortlisting candidates
- Scheduling interviews and coordinating communication
- Guiding new hires through onboarding steps
- Answering employee policy and benefits queries
Knowledge Management and Research
- Searching internal documents and SOPs
- Answering policy or process-related questions
- Summarizing reports and research material
- Supporting analysis and information retrieval
Type of AI Agents We Develop
At ThirdEye Data, we build AI agents based on how much intelligence, autonomy, and control a business needs, not only based on department complexities. Each type represents a delivery pattern we apply across multiple use cases.
Task-Oriented Agents
These agents automate clearly defined tasks within a workflow. They follow structured logic and operate within strict boundaries.
Decision-Support Agents
These agents analyze data, apply business rules, and present recommendations. Final decisions remain with human owners.
Workflow-Orchestration Agents
These agents manage multi-step processes across systems and teams. They track state, trigger actions, and escalate issues.
Knowledge-Centric Agents
These agents retrieve, synthesize, and present information from single and/or multiple enterprise data sources.
Multi-Agent Systems
These systems involve multiple specialized agents working together under a coordinated control layer towards a common goal.
Platform-Native Agents
These agents are built directly within enterprise platforms to align with security, identity, and governance standards.
Our AI Agent Development Project References
Below are some representative case studies on the agent-based solutions our team has delivered using controlled, enterprise-grade architectures.
Designed and implemented a Multi-Agent Investment Research Tool, a Copilot-based assistant that automates the end-to-end process of investment discovery, data collection, analysis, and reporting.
Developed a multi-agent system that transforms how loyalty programs are managed and experienced for a leading marketing company.
Designed and implemented an intelligent AI agent to empower organizations with highly efficient, context-aware search capabilities across large volumes of content.
Developed an AI-powered knowledge repository chatbot application designed to transform how IT professionals access and interact with organizational knowledge.
Our Solution Approach to Develop AI Agents
Our AI agent development process is not tool-driven. Primarily, it is use-case driven. We select open source tech stack, commercial platforms, or a hybrid approach based on how the agent needs to reason, act, integrate, and scale inside enterprise systems. Our goal is to balance control, speed, governance, and long-term ownership.
Open Source AI Agent Development Approach
We take an open source approach when enterprises need maximum control and customization. We have found this is common in complex decision flows, regulated environments, or data-sensitive operations. The open-source frameworks allow us to design agent reasoning, memory, orchestration, and integrations in detail.
This approach comes with transparency and flexibility. It also requires strong engineering practices and clear ownership. We recommend it when enterprises want full visibility into how agents behave and evolve.
Commercial Tools-Based AI Agent Development Approach
We utilize commercial platforms when enterprises request faster deployment and built-in governance. These tools provide enterprise-grade security, access control, monitoring, and compliance features. They are well-suited for organizations that want predictable operations and lower maintenance effort.
We have deep, long-term experience within the Microsoft Azure ecosystem. This includes Azure AI services, AI Foundry, Microsoft Fabric, and Power Platform. These platforms work well for decision support, workflow automation, and business-led agent deployments.
Hybrid Approach (Open Source + Commercial) for AI Agent Development
We have worked on many enterprise use cases that require both flexibility and control. In these cases, we design a hybrid approach. Open source components handle complex reasoning and customization. Commercial platforms manage integration, governance, and scale.
This approach allows enterprises to move fast without losing control. It also supports gradual change as business needs evolve. We often recommend this model for large organizations with diverse systems and teams.
Why We Think This Matters to All Enterprises
Choosing the wrong approach can create long-term risk. It can lead to lock-in, poor scalability, or governance gaps. Our experience allows enterprises to make informed decisions early. This reduces rework and builds confidence in production deployments.
Consult with Our Agentic AI Experts
Feel free to consult with our experts to choose the right approach for building AI agent-based solutions or applications.
Technology Stack We Use for Developing AI Agents
We design AI agents using a layered and modular technology stack, selected based on business criticality, data sensitivity, and integration complexity.
Our experience spans open-source ecosystems and enterprise commercial platforms, allowing us to choose the right combination for each engagement.
Open-Source Frameworks & Tools
Foundation Models
OpenAI’s GPT, LLaMA, Mistral, and similar open models for self-hosted reasoning
Fine-tuned domain models for task-specific intelligence
Agent Frameworks & Orchestration
LangChain and LangGraph for structured agent workflows
AutoGen, CrewAI, MetaGPT for multi-agent coordination
Custom-built orchestration layers for deterministic execution
Memory & Retrieval
Chroma, Weaviate, FAISS for vector-based memory
Open-source RAG pipelines for document-grounded agents
Automation & Integration
Python-based agent tools and API integrations
Event-driven architectures for agent-triggered workflows
RPA frameworks for legacy system interaction
Infrastructure
Docker and Kubernetes for scalable deployments
Self-hosted inference servers for private environments
Commercial Tools & Platforms
Foundation Models
Azure OpenAI models for secure, enterprise-grade deployments
OpenAI models for advanced reasoning and rapid innovation
Agent & Copilot Platforms
Microsoft Copilot Studio for business-facing agents
Power Virtual Agents for structured conversational workflows
Power Automate for agent-driven process automation
Search, Memory & Knowledge Systems
Azure Cognitive Search for enterprise RAG implementations
Managed databases for state and context persistence
Integration & Workflow Execution
Azure Functions and Logic Apps for reliable agent actions
Native connectors for CRM, ERP, HRMS, finance systems
Security & Identity
Azure Active Directory and managed identities
Role-based access control and audit logging
Monitoring & Governance
Azure Monitor and Application Insights
Usage analytics and cost tracking for AI workloads
Insights Our Developers Shared on AI Agent Development
Answering Frequently Asked Questions
AI agents make sense when decisions are frequent, time-sensitive, and tied to multiple systems. If a process relies on human judgment applied repeatedly, an agent can assist or automate it. If the process is static, traditional automation is usually enough.
We start with the decision itself, not the technology. We analyze how the decision is made today, what data is used, and what actions follow. If reasoning, context, and system interaction are involved, an AI agent is appropriate.
They start with tools instead of workflows. Many pilots fail because agents are built as demos, not as part of real operations. We design agents to live inside existing processes, not alongside them.
They bring consistency. Agents apply the same logic every time, backed by data and rules. Humans still make final calls where needed, but agents reduce noise, delay, and variability.
Yes, when they are designed with control points. We use guardrails, approvals, and fallback logic. Agents do not operate blindly. They operate within defined boundaries.
We design for data separation and access control from day one. Sensitive data stays within approved systems. LLM access is controlled. Every agent action can be logged and audited.
Yes. Many of our implementations use open-source models or Azure-hosted services in private setups. We design for regulatory constraints, not around them.
Integration is where most complexity lies. We use APIs, events, and workflow engines. If a system cannot be integrated directly, we design controlled automation layers around it.
Not if built correctly. We design agents as modular systems. Logic, prompts, tools, and data sources can be updated independently without rebuilding everything.
For focused use cases, value is visible within weeks of deployment. We avoid large, risky rollouts. We start small, prove impact, and scale.
None of our clients uses agents to reduce teams. They use them to reduce overload. Agents take care of routine work so people can focus on decisions that matter.
We define what the agent is allowed to decide and what it must escalate. Agents do not replace accountability. Humans remain responsible, supported by the agent.
Copilot is useful where business teams need speed and governance. We use it when it fits the use case. We do not force it where custom agent logic is required.
We use open source when control, customization, or private deployment is critical. We use commercial platforms when scale, security, and enterprise governance matter. Many solutions use both.
We measure metrics like reduced cycle time, fewer handoffs, lower error rates, and better decision visibility. If those metrics do not move, the agent is not doing its job.
Agents are designed to adapt. We expect processes to change. That is why we avoid hard-coded logic and design flexible decision layers.
Business input is critical during discovery. After that, involvement is minimal. We design agents to work with existing teams, not disrupt them.
Because we do not oversell autonomy. We build what we know works. Our focus is decision intelligence and workflow automation. Enterprises trust us because we deliver practical systems, not experiments.
Relevant Pages to Explore
